Conspiracy theory videos

Description:  An Al Qaeda representative says that claims the U.S. government was behind the attacks on Sept. 11th are demeaning to ...




Description:  This documentary puts forth some troubling questions. It doesn't answer them but lets you use your own head. I highly ...




Description:  Rising French actress Marion Cotillard has risked jeopardising her Hollywood career after suggesting 9/11 was a hoax.




Description:  A short video banned from T.V. Tells a short truth of the television industry.




Description:  conspiracy theory

Tags: conspiracy



Description:  In this vlog Dan talks about conspiracy theories. What do you think about conspiracy theories? Post a comment or a video ...




Description:  Exposing some of the lies and corruption from warmongering puppets such as George W Bush, Tony Blair, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Powell ...




Description:  Have you ever wondered why the Kersal Massive are so mysterious. Why is Little Kev so angry, why does MC Mack ...




Description:  This cartoon appeared in the original March broadcast of the SNL episode, but was cut from the summer rerun. SNL ...



Play poker online against real people just like you! Practice your skills or learn to play with free chips... or play with real money!

100% deposit bonus, up to $600!


Play Online Poker
Play Online Poker
Fetzer on 9-11

Those who were overwhelmed by the events of 9/11 may be overwhelmed again to discover that the government's official account cannot be sustained. Here, a philosopher of science explains that the plane crashes causing fires causing steel to melt and floors to collapse violates laws of physics and engineering and cannot possibly be correct. The collapse of the Twin Towers displays all of the characteristics of controlled demolitions, including the near gravity speed at which they fell, their symmetrical collapse into their own footprints, and their conversion of concrete into very fine dust. The offical account does not even address the collapse of WTC7 nor adequately explain the Pentagon attack. The government's own "conspiracy theory" about 9/11 cannot possibly be true.
Length: 00:58:30

Video Comments:
flyzerogravity (November 21, 2008 at 3:54 am)
Believing is easy accepting is hard even in the face of such truths that psyhics can prove. Add our history and it may be the only thing that fits all the facts. Sherlock Holmes would say that after all evidence is in and you are left with no other possible explanations you are left with the truth. Great reseach, great video!
junysgr (November 14, 2008 at 7:28 am)
Oh God!!!!
myjuliaisacutie (November 8, 2008 at 1:46 am)
if there were thermate charges at the point of impact, they would have exploded, not survived no?
EdgemanLL2 (November 8, 2008 at 10:35 am)
Thermite does not explode. Its an incindiary. not an explosive.

Which is why its completely unsuitable for demolition work--at least for the actually collapse of the building.
EdgemanLL2 (November 7, 2008 at 2:11 pm)
I looked it up years ago, back when Jones first started feeding you guys this lie.

Cia supported militants in afghansitan who were fighting the russians, true.

Alqueda itself was a mid-1990s construct of OBL.
myjuliaisacutie (November 7, 2008 at 1:33 pm)
why did 7 fall and not 5 or 6. explain that one.
EdgemanLL2 (November 7, 2008 at 2:10 pm)
Different design, different height, different damage, different fires, different fire suppression (7s was cut off in the towers collapse), different construction.

Whe ber surprised at different results?

Not everyone who gets cancer dies from it. According to you, thats proof its impossible to die from cancer.

Each situation is different. Ergo, outcomes will be different.
myjuliaisacutie (November 8, 2008 at 1:51 am)
Do show us the design plans. (both steel structures no? what has height got to do with it? different damage, indeed, damage was worse at 5 and 6, different fire suppression, please explain the difference, different construction,, what's different?

Both steel framed structures, both took hits when 1,2 came down (5,6 taking falling 30ft steel beams directly ontop of the buildings)

The situations that are really different are 1,2 in opposition to 7. planes, design, height construction...
EdgemanLL2 (November 8, 2008 at 10:33 am)
what's different?""

Is all relevent. Each building is different, and therefore each building has a different way to a collapse.

You guys always claim to know so many demolition specialists. We all know you lie when you say this. But if you actually ever MEET a demo guy they will tell you every job is different. What can take ONE building down can be completely different from what takes a diff building down.
myjuliaisacutie (November 7, 2008 at 1:32 pm)
do some research on it,,,, very interesting
Advertise Here

XXX  ::  Fuck  ::  Sex  ::  Porn  ::  Nude Models  ::  Nude Celebs  ::  Celebrity Porn  ::  Porn Reviews  ::  Free Porn  ::  Porn  ::  Play Video Games  ::  Nukebox Videos  ::  


the best sponsors
the best affiliate programs



© 2008 urbanarmor.net