Pentagon videos

Description:  A short animation with video and photos illustrating the final moments of Flight 77 on September 11, 2001.




Description:  Rare Pentagon 9-11 Surveilence Camera Video of Impact. Does not seem to indicate a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon. Doesn't ...




Description:  Mike Gravel tells the story of how he released the secret Pentagon Papers into the public record.




Description:  TAKE ACTION HERE: Mainstream media are ignoring one of the biggest political scandals in recent memory. Demand a full Congressional ...




Description:  This is previously unreleased footage obtained by Judicial Watch of American Airlines Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon. For more info ...




Description:  Stanley Meyer and many others. Always the same story. The Pentagon wants to see your idea and tell you how ...




Description:  Pentagon admits $2.3 Trillion missing and Rumsfeld calls it a matter of "life and death."




Description:  The New York Times has exposed a secret Pentagon campaign to infiltrate the media with pro-war propaganda. The scheme reaches ...



Play poker online against real people just like you! Practice your skills or learn to play with free chips... or play with real money!

100% deposit bonus, up to $600!


Play Online Poker
Play Online Poker
911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77

A short animation with video and photos illustrating the final moments of Flight 77 on September 11, 2001.
Length: 00:06:16

Video Comments:
lijebaley01 (October 10, 2008 at 3:03 pm)
h t t p ://w w w . aal77. com/citgo/Citgo%20Update. pdf
tubegovernment (October 10, 2008 at 2:51 pm)
donald rumsfeld expressed his dismay over the vast amounts of money that the pentagon cannot account for in its budget. an estimated 25% or 2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS went MISSING as stated on 09/10/01. the very next day, the pentagon was hit exactly in the office where the coverup investigation was held.

alCIAda inside job.
tubegovernment (October 10, 2008 at 2:48 pm)
people heared massive multiple explosions, everywhere in the pentagon. they were ducking for cover, afterwards the huge impact of the missile came.

nearly all witnesses saw a tiny white plane, that does make one think.

i only dont understand all those witnesses, who escaped the exposions, and the missile that followed, followed again by more explosions, the air smelling of explosives.
none of them were allowed to testify.

9/11 = inside job.
marksman500 (October 10, 2008 at 2:12 pm)
WAKEN..."planting the FDR adds to the myth that a 757 did crash their."...
----
It does? Please explain how 2 FDR's were needed to .."adds to the myth that a 757 did crash their"..?

Why wouldnt the one/original ..."FDR adds to the myth that a 757 did crash their"..?

Saying ..."it is likely both were planted."...
Likely?...as in could have?
Are you SPECULATION again!...lol
Likely Does not count in the real world.
Only in your CT world.

Now prove 2 were planted!!!
marksman500 (October 10, 2008 at 2:06 pm)
waken, Should have read..."There are plane parts, engines, rims & tire Pics. Passengers still strapped in their seats, and the Black boxes were found!"...
lijebaley01 (October 10, 2008 at 1:30 pm)
h t t p ://arabesque911. blogspot. com/2007/05/critical-review-of -pentacon-smoking-gun. html ---this is another
lijebaley01 (October 10, 2008 at 1:29 pm)
you dont tell me who you have as witnesses, I have to try to figure it out on my own. Is it renzi? the incredible fast and steep descent? or maybe Omar when the plane flew right over his head, no idea where he was though. I found 2 of my sites, and they work fine, once the spaces are removed, perhaps it's too hard a task for you? Still looking for the citgo tape analysis one, that proves lagasse and brooks wrong: h t t p ://mouv4x8. club. fr/11Sept01/A0082_b_They%20saw %20the%20aircraft. htm
cdddraftsman (October 10, 2008 at 1:26 pm)
Believe otherwise indicates you wakentard have a overactive imagination , too easliy engaged willing suspension of disbelief & haven't taken the time to do the most important thing in life . Get enough education to know when a hoax is being perpetrated . YOU are just too easily FOOLED by hoaxers , charltons & con-artists . Your not alone : In 2005 USG reported 1 in 3 lost $ on scams by the same CT hoaxers who rely on the dumbing down of ppl. like u .
cdddraftsman (October 10, 2008 at 1:24 pm)
Note :

Critics of these CT's say they are a form of conspiracism common throughout history after a traumatic event in which CT's emerge as a mythic form of explanation (Barkun, 2003). A related criticism addresses the form of research on which the CT's are based. Thomas W. Eagar, an eng. prof. at MIT, suggested they "use the 'reverse scientific method'. They determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion & then hail their findings as the only conclusion."
wakenbake22 (October 10, 2008 at 1:20 pm)
lije
How does the Citgo prove Lagasse and Brooks are wrong?
The NORAD video released by FAA on Sept 13th 2008 is the "new" NORAD video, that shows it fly over navy annex as Paik siad, north of Citgo like the rest.
All you've done is lie.
Paik is farthest from the Pentagon, doesn't see what happens after it flies over Annex, but that is the one you want to believe?
Over Navy Annex means it did not hit the light poles, so what is your point?
Advertise Here

Nude Models  ::  Nude Celebs  ::  Celebrity Porn  ::  Porn Reviews  ::  Free Porn  ::  Porn  ::  Play Video Games  ::  Nukebox Videos  ::  


the best sponsors
the best affiliate programs



© 2008 urbanarmor.net